How sharply quantity answers price — and why total revenue peaks exactly where the answer is one-for-one. Elasticity E = (dQ/Q)/(dP/P) = (dQ/dP)·(P/Q) is negative down a demand curve; revenue R = P·Q crests at |E| = 1. Rendered, not quoted. These are models of markets, not investment advice.
source Alfred Marshall, Principles of Economics (1890), Book III Ch. 4 “The Elasticity of Wants” — marxists.org archive (public-domain transcription; no publisher DOI — AMBER).
Point elasticity is the log-slope of demand:
E = (dQ/dP)·(P/Q)
Down a demand curve dQ/dP < 0, so E is negative. By magnitude:
• |E| > 1 — elastic (quantity answers hard)
• |E| < 1 — inelastic (quantity barely moves)
• |E| = 1 — unit-elastic (one-for-one)
Linear demand Q = a − bP runs |E| from ∞ (choke price) to 0 (free), passing through 1 at the midpoint P = a/2b. Constant-elasticity Q = cP−e holds E = −e everywhere.
Marshall 1890 gave the responsiveness a number. That number is what sets tax incidence in the-supply-and-demand: the inelastic side of a market carries the heavier share of any tax, because it cannot flee the price. Same E, next sphere.
Live re-check of every identity below. Green = the engine still proves what it claims; it flips red the instant the Red-Team tamper (6) touches the elasticity formula.
re-checking…
Linear demand: a = 100, b = 2 → Q = 100 − 2P
Constant-E demand: c = 1000, e = 1.5 → Q = 1000·P−1.5
Tolerance for the numeric root: 1e−6
Demand curve (violet), revenue R=P·Q (pink). The vertical line marks the unit-elastic midpoint where revenue crests.
Choke price P=a/b = 50 · revenue-max P=a/2b = 25 · |E| there = 1 · max R = 1250
Proven: dR/dP = 0 lands exactly on |E| = 1 (to 1e−6). A price cut raises revenue where elastic, lowers it where inelastic. Constant-E demand holds E = −e at every price.
booting…
Elasticity is a local number, not a curve's label. “Demand is inelastic” is only true at a price. The same straight line is elastic up top and inelastic down low.
The clean formulas assume a smooth, single-valued demand curve, rational agents and ceteris paribus AMBER — idealizations, not laws of nature. Real demand shifts, kinks, and remembers.
Any elasticity read off future prices is a forecast AMBER, not advice.
P/Q to be unitless. Drop that factor and the revenue identity collapses (see 6).P=0 (R=0). Revenue peaks at the midpoint, |E|=1.Strip the P/Q factor so E → dQ/dP (a bare slope). The revenue-max–at–unit-elasticity identity breaks, and the Witness (7) catches it live.
state: clean