THE KEPLER ORBIT

One mass falls around another and traces an ellipse — not by decree but by three unbreakable laws. The engine integrates the two-body problem under inverse-square gravity with a symplectic map, then reads the conserved quantities straight off the trajectory: the conic, the swept areas, the period ratio. Rendered, not quoted.

source Kepler, Astronomia Nova (1609) · Harmonices Mundi (1619) — archive.org/details/astronomianovaai00kepl (facsimile; stable IA mirror)

Blue Teambuilds & defends
3THE MODEL

A point mass at position r moves under Newton's inverse-square pull toward a fixed centre (reduced two-body form, GM = 1):

r̈ = −GM · r / |r|³

Two quantities never change along the path — the specific energy and the angular momentum:

E = ½v² − GM/r   L = x·vᵧ − y·vₓ

From them alone the shape follows: a conic with the centre at a focus, semi-major axis a = −GM/2E and eccentricity e = √(1 + 2EL²/GM²).

5THE LINEAGE

The closed ellipse is the two-body case of what the-n-body traces. Take Newton's gravity, keep two masses, and Kepler's three empirical laws fall out as theorems — conservation turned into geometry.

Add a third mass and the ellipse stops closing: it precesses, it wanders. Kepler's exact ellipse is the reachable island in the n-body sea — the case that has closed-form conserved quantities.

7THE WITNESS

Live re-check: integrate one radial period and measure the apsidal angle Δφ swept perihelion-to-perihelion. A genuine inverse-square orbit closes at exactly 2π. If window 6 tampers the force law, the orbit precesses and this flips red.

checking…
The Machinedata in → engine → data out
4DATA INin ↓

Initial state at perihelion, GM = 1, symplectic step dt = 0.0012:

Orbit A  r₀=(1, 0)  v₀=(0, 1.1)
Orbit B  r₀=(1.4, 0)  v₀=(0, 1.0)  — different size, for Kepler III
0THE PANELlit
r   |v| E   L   swept/step force

Gold sectors are swept in equal times — equal areas (Kepler II). The star sits at a focus, not the centre.

8DATA OUTout ↓

Proven off the trajectory, not assumed:

computing…
Red Teamattacks & breaks
1THE ADVERSARYwall
"Your perfect ellipse is a lie. Real orbits precess — Mercury's perihelion advances 43″/century that Newton can't explain."

True, and honest: this is the two-body Newtonian idealization. The residual is real physics the model omits —

  • AMBER — general relativity adds a 1/r³ correction; Mercury's 43″/century is its signature.
  • AMBER — other planets perturb: the n-body Solar System never gives a truly closed ellipse.
  • Point masses & a fixed centre are assumed; finite-mass bodies orbit a shared barycentre.

Inside its stated frame the ellipse is exact — and the checks below prove it.

2THE GRAVEYARD

Orbits are perfect circles on nested spheres.  → ellipses; the circle is the e=0 special case (Kepler I).

A planet moves at constant speed along its path.  → it sweeps equal areas in equal times — fast at perihelion, slow at aphelion (Kepler II).

The Sun sits at the centre of the orbit.  → at a focus; the other focus is empty.

Period depends on shape or eccentricity.  → T²/a³ is one constant for every orbit, whatever its e (Kepler III).

6THE TAMPER

The disclosed planted void: swap the force law to inverse-r (1/r instead of 1/r²). By Bertrand's theorem only 1/r² and Hooke's law give closed orbits — so the ellipse should precess and Kepler III should break. The WITNESS in window 7 catches it live.