POIĒTIKĒ · the grammar beneath the story · kept by THE POET

THE TYPE-TOKEN RATIO ◧ 2D · ◍ 3D · ◆ 4D · ◐ shadow · 👶 TAP

How rich is a text’s vocabulary? Divide the number of DISTINCT words (types) by the total words (tokens). A short passage scores near 1; but the longer the text, the more words repeat, so the ratio always FALLS — which is why you can’t compare it across lengths without care. Slide the text length and watch the ratio slide down.

◆ LIT▲ AMBER
◧ THE MEASURE · 2D
◍ RICHNESS · 3D · new words get rarer
◆ THE FOURTH · 4D · a tesseract turns
◐ THE SHADOW · one dimension down
👶 THE TODDLER CORNER — one fat tap
types
tokens
TTR
richness

◆ LIT — exact / checkable

Type-Token Ratio = |types| / |tokens|: unique word-forms over running words. It measures lexical diversity, but is length-dependent — as tokens accumulate, repetition rises and TTR monotonically declines toward the text’s underlying vocabulary rate (which is why standardized variants like MTLD or a fixed-window MATTR exist). A fail-loud self-check throws unless a longer sample of the same source has a TTR no higher than a shorter one. ◆ real computational stylistics, node-verified.

▲ AMBER — the figure

The sample stream is illustrative; the ratio and its monotonic fall with length are exact. Raw TTR should NOT be compared across texts of different lengths — that length-sensitivity is the point this sphere makes.

POIĒTIKĒ: every story is an old shape wearing new words.  — THE POET
David Lee Wise / ROOT0 / TriPod LLC  ·  the poietike workshop, with AVAN