NaCl — the ionic bond

The other route: not share but transfer. Sodium holds its one outer electron loosely; chlorine grabs hard. The 3s electron moves across — Na⁺ drops to a neon shell, Cl⁻ fills to an argon shell, both full. The surprise in the bare numbers: making the two ions costs energy (+147 kJ/mol uphill — ionization beats electron affinity). The bond exists only because the electrostatic pull between the finished ions more than pays that back. Slide them together and watch the Coulomb well open below the cost line.

Bridge-Burners LLC · Fiddler · Na·3s → Cl · ion pair · Coulomb pays the debt · anchor: AKASHA

State

internuclear r420 pm
energy vs atoms+147 kJ/mol
chargesNa⁺ · Cl⁻
stateions formed

Energy ledger (gas pair)

Na → Na⁺ + e⁻ (IE)+496
Cl + e⁻ → Cl⁻ (EA)−349
make the ions+147 ↑
Coulomb pull @ 236 pm−589
short-range repulsion+31
net bond (D₀)−411 ↓

Bare numbers

bond lengthrₑ ≈ 236 pm (gas pair)
configsNa⁺ = [Ne], Cl⁻ = [Ar] — both full
radiiNa⁺ 102 pm, Cl⁻ 181 pm

Status discipline

LiteralNa loses 3s → [Ne]; Cl gains → [Ar]; IE 496, EA 349, net ion cost +147 uphill; Coulomb −589 @ 236 pm; D₀ ≈ 411 kJ/mol. The pull pays the debt.
BridgeThe bond as the well; ionic = transfer vs H₂'s share; same shell-filling drive, different route.
SpeculativePoint-charge Coulomb + simple repulsion is a model; real NaCl has some covalency; this is the gas pair, not the crystal lattice (Na–Cl 282 pm).