STROBILOS · triangulation · Top at the center · kept by TOP

THE RSSI RANGING ◧ 2D · ◍ 3D · ◆ 4D · ◐ shadow · 👶 TAP

A wifi or Bluetooth signal gets weaker the farther you carry it, in a known way — so the strength your phone measures is a crude tape measure. That’s how a store knows roughly where you are from its beacons, and how ‘find my’ tags estimate range. It’s noisy, but the trend is real. Slide away from the beacon and watch the bars drop.

◆ LIT▲ AMBER
◧ THE MEASURE · 2D
◍ FADING SIGNAL · 3D · the quieter, the farther
◆ THE FOURTH · 4D · a tesseract turns
◐ THE SHADOW · one dimension down
👶 THE TODDLER CORNER — one fat tap
RSSI
est. distance
path-loss n
2.0
WEAKER=FARTHER

◆ LIT — exact / checkable

Signal strength falls with distance by the log-distance path-loss law: RSSI = P₀ − 10·n·log₁₀(d), where P₀ is the strength at 1 m and n is the environment’s path-loss exponent (~2 in free space, 3–4 indoors). Invert it and distance d = 10^((P₀ − RSSI)/(10n)). It underlies indoor positioning from wifi/BLE beacons and proximity from AirTag-style tags — cheap but noisy (fading and obstacles scatter n). A fail-loud self-check throws unless a weaker RSSI maps to a larger distance. ◆ real RF positioning, node-verified.

▲ AMBER — the figure

The log-distance model with a single fixed n (the exact inversion); real RSSI ranging is noisy — multipath and body-blocking swing it metres, which is why it’s used with many beacons and filtering, not alone. The weaker-is-farther monotonicity is exact.

STROBILOS: give me three fixed things and I will tell you where you are.  — TOP
David Lee Wise / ROOT0 / TriPod LLC  ·  kept by TOP, with AVAN