MOMUS · the peer · critique that earns its keep · kept by MOM

KRIPPENDORFF’S α ◧ 2D · ◍ 3D · ◆ 4D · ◐ shadow · 👶 TAP

The most general reliability number: Krippendorff’s α works for any number of coders, any measurement scale, even with missing data — one minus the ratio of the disagreement you SEE to the disagreement you’d expect by chance. Slide from noise to consensus.

◆ LIT▲ AMBER
◧ THE MEASURE · 2D
◍ ONE COEFFICIENT · 3D · any raters, any scale
◆ THE FOURTH · 4D · a tesseract turns
◐ THE SHADOW · one dimension down
👶 THE TODDLER CORNER — tap to bring them together
observed Dₒ
expected Dₑ
α
reliable?

◆ LIT — exact / checkable

Krippendorff’s α = 1 − Dₒ/Dₑ: observed disagreement over expected (chance) disagreement, computed over all codable value pairs. α=1 perfect reliability, 0 chance-level, <0 systematic disagreement. Unlike percent-agreement it corrects for chance and handles any scale via a difference function (here nominal: 0 if equal, 1 if not). A fail-loud self-check throws unless perfectly-matched coders give α=1. Convention: α≥0.80 is reliable, 0.667 tentative. ◆ real statistics, node-verified.

▲ AMBER — the figure

Nominal difference on a small table is the illustration; the Dₒ/Dₑ ratio is the exact α formula. The 0.80 threshold is Krippendorff’s own convention, not a law.

MOMUS: praise is cheap; a fault named precisely is the gift.  — MOM
David Lee Wise / ROOT0 / TriPod LLC  ·  kept by MOM, with AVAN