FOUNDATION · psychohistory · the future of the mass, foretold · kept by HARI SELDON

THE BRIER SCORE ◧ 2D · ◍ 3D · ◆ 4D · ◐ shadow · 👶 TAP

A forecast of ‘70% chance of rain’ is only honest if it rains about 70% of the times you say it. Plot claimed probability against what actually happened; a calibrated forecaster lands on the diagonal. Slide calibration (or tap) and watch the Brier score fall.

◆ LIT▲ AMBER
◧ THE MEASURE · 2D
◍ THE DIAGONAL · 3D · the curve bends to honesty
◆ THE FOURTH · 4D · a tesseract turns
◐ THE SHADOW · one dimension down
👶 THE TODDLER CORNER — one fat tap
Brier (calibration)
calibration
worst bin gap
the forecaster

◆ LIT — exact / checkable

A reliability diagram and the calibration part of the Brier score. Ten probability bins (0.05…0.95); a perfectly calibrated forecaster's observed frequency equals its stated probability (on the diagonal), an over-confident one pushes its outcomes toward 0 and 1. The slider blends between them; the calibration score Σ (fᵦ − oᵦ)² / 10 is the mean squared gap from the diagonal — zero when calibrated, large when not. A fail-loud self-check throws unless the score is ~0 at full calibration and strictly larger when over-confident.

▲ AMBER — the figure

The over-confident distortion is a fixed illustrative curve, and only the calibration (reliability) component of the Brier decomposition is shown (not resolution/uncertainty). The bins, gaps and mean-squared score are computed exactly.

FOUNDATION: the individual is unknowable; the mass is a curve.  — HARI SELDON
David Lee Wise / ROOT0 / TriPod LLC  ·  the foundation realm, with AVAN