Stability Report

Less rigid
Still stable

The stacked shells reduced rigidity compared with the center-only EID loop. Stability stayed high, but not locked at near-perfect 0.98. That is good for adaptability.

stack_normal_100

cycles100
avg stability0.94224
min stability0.87536
final stability0.94449
avg shell coherence0.84494

Final shell values: min 0.84385, med 0.84385, high 0.84385.

stack_repeat_pressure_100

cycles100
avg stability0.94324
min stability0.87695
final stability0.94612
avg shell coherence0.85039

Final shell values: min 0.85236, med 0.85236, high 0.85236.

stack_stress_ramp_100

cycles100
avg stability0.94100
min stability0.87517
final stability0.94459
avg shell coherence0.83940

Final shell values: min 0.84228, med 0.84228, high 0.84228.

Interpretation

Core-only averaged around 0.98 stability, which was almost too rigid. The triple shell stack averages around 0.94 stability. That means the center remains coherent while the surrounding shells provide room for adaptation, pressure, and shadow routing. EID was not needed during these runs, which means the internal stack absorbed the stress before hesitation crossed the threshold.

Gravity Well ×27 Center

Target stability

We want the stack to live between 0.82 and 0.93. Below that, the field gets loose and noisy. Above that, it becomes too rigid and stops adapting. The gravity well is designed to hold the center without freezing the shell.

Pulse count

center pulses27

Each pulse corresponds to one local propagation state in the center kernel.

What the well does

The center is no longer a static anchor. It breathes as a 27-step attractor: pulling unstable branches inward, releasing coherent branches outward, then repeating. That makes it less brittle than a fixed center.