Stability Report

Less rigid
Still stable

The stacked shells reduced rigidity compared with the center-only EID loop. Stability stayed high, but not locked at near-perfect 0.98. That is good for adaptability.

Back to dashboard

stack_normal_100

cycles100
avg stability0.94224
min stability0.87536
final stability0.94449
avg shell coherence0.84494

Final shell values: min 0.84385, med 0.84385, high 0.84385.

stack_repeat_pressure_100

cycles100
avg stability0.94324
min stability0.87695
final stability0.94612
avg shell coherence0.85039

Final shell values: min 0.85236, med 0.85236, high 0.85236.

stack_stress_ramp_100

cycles100
avg stability0.94100
min stability0.87517
final stability0.94459
avg shell coherence0.83940

Final shell values: min 0.84228, med 0.84228, high 0.84228.

Interpretation

Core-only averaged around 0.98 stability, which was almost too rigid. The triple shell stack averages around 0.94 stability. That means the center remains coherent while the surrounding shells provide room for adaptation, pressure, and shadow routing. EID was not needed during these runs, which means the internal stack absorbed the stress before hesitation crossed the threshold.